Taking a little stroll down Memory Lane and some history of the origins of the United Nations.

Like a phoenix arising from the ashes, in 1945 the United Nations came into being as a replacement for a now discredited League of Nations, established after World War 1 to prevent future war. The League of Nations had never been a fully representative body, nor did it have formal powers to exert influence when disputes arose, and by 1939 it had become redundant and was unable to prevent the outbreak of World War 2. In the aftermath of that long war, there was widespread belief that some new institution had to be created, one better able to arbitrate international conflict and negotiate peace, with broader goals than prevention of war and formal powers beyond those of a mere advisory body, including, if required, the power of military back up.

The forty nations that founded the new United Nations, with Poland joining later, signed a charter based on recommendations worked out by representatives from China, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom and the United States. Article 1.1 stated its main purpose:

To maintain international peace and security and to that end to take effective and collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace.

There was another important objective described in the Charter respecting principles of equal rights and self determination for all peoples, which in the context of the post-war period, was directed at those small nations in danger of being swallowed up by the Communist behemoths emerging from the war, and supporting this objective, in 1948 the first General Assembly of the U.N. adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, affirming:

* Everyone has the right to take part in the government of the country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.

* The will of the people shall be the basis of authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent voting procedures.

It was not envisaged that the United Nations organization, a body for peace and freedom, would itself morph into a creeping behemoth of global power and dominance, but it has.

A lot of water under the bridge since 1948 and that affirmation by the U.N. that the right to govern lies with the nation state and is derived from the consent of its people.

You’ve Come a Long Way, Baby…

From its beginnings in 1948 to the early 1990s, the U.N. was heavily engaged in peace- keeping operations from monitoring the Armistice Agreement in the Middle East between Israel and its Arab neighbours to more than seventy peace keeping operations, including involvement in Cold War inter-state disputes and civil war in Africa and the former Yugoslavia. Some of these involvements were relatively successful, others, as in Rwanda and Sbrenica, spectacularly unsuccessful, when U.N. peacekeepers failed to intervene to prevent mass genocide.

Increasingly peace keeping began to include multi-dimensional missions requiring more administrators, police officers, legal experts, economists, electoral observers, and human rights monitors. More bureaucracy, more office HQs needed as activities expanded, not only related to peace-keeping but as a result of new roles in global intervention that the UN was taking upon itself from the 1970’s onwards.

New and expanded agencies, this is what bureaucrats do. From that U.N. original official headquarters in Geneva to the official HQ General Assembly in New York, and the International Court at The Hague, the U.N. proceeded to set up regional offices to house its expanding specialized agencies, in Washington … U.N. International Monetary System, and its education organization, UNESCO, in Rome … the Food and Agriculture Organization, in Paris…the Science and Cultural Organization, in Vienna … Industry and Development Organization and there were other HQ’s in Nairobi and Montreal. Geneva became HQ for the International Labour Organization and also for the World Health Organization and the United Nations’ World Meteorological Organization.

Expansion details. In 1983, the U.N.General Assembly convened the World Commission on Environment and Development, also called the Brundtland Commission. This Commission, chaired by Gro Harlem Bruntland, was charged with finding a long term solution to environmental problems of ozone depletion and global warming, a solution involving processes of managing national resources and processes of international cooperation. The Brundtland Report, published in 1987 as Our Common Future, stated that the time had come for a marriage between the environment and the economy involving a changed economic model and new mode of governance. It introduced the term ‘sustainable development,’ a prescription to ensure that economic development would not endanger the ability of future generations to enjoy the fruits of the earth. From the Report:

‘ The challenge of finding sustainable development paths ought to provide the impetus – indeed the imperative – for a renewed search for multilateral solutions and a restructured international economic system of co-operation. These challenges cut across the divides of national sovereignty, of limited strategies for economic gain, and of separated disciplines of science.’ ‘Our Common Future. From One Earth to One World.’ Gro Harlem Brundtland.Oslo.1987

Agenda 21, Sustainable Development. – we’ll get to it eventually …

Say, What’s Behind the Green Door?

Behind Agenda 21, blueprint for global governance there’s the United Nations’ Brundtland Report recommendation for a new economic model and first mention of Sustainable Development, with a capital ‘S’ and a capital ‘D.’ Behind the Brundtland Report you have the Trilateral Commission, an elite organization with powerful members, bankers, directors of industry, politicians, media heavies. Gro Brundtland, ex-Prime-Minister of Norway, was herself a member. And what do the members of the Trilateral Commission want? Why, they want a new world order, a world order based on an economic model first advocated by a group at Columbia University during the economic depression of the 1930’s but discredited in the same decade. In the 1980’s this movement for a new world order became another phoenix arising, thanks to the efforts of the Trilateral Commission. Here’s an informative you tube overview of its history by Patrick M. Wood, financial analyst and author who has studied elite globalization policies since the 1970s when with scholar Antony Sutton, he co-authored the book, ‘Trilaterals over Washington.’ https://tragedyandhope.com/technocracy-trilaterals-tpp-an-interview-with-patrick-wood/

The Trilateral Commission was created in 1973 by David Rockefeller and political scientist, Zbigniew Brzezinski, (author of the book,’ Between Two Ages: America in the Technetronic Era,’) with the stated aim of fostering a global technocracy to manage the world’s resources efficiently… Say, I’ve read the Brzezinski book, found it depressingly reminiscent of the philosopher king, Plato, in Karl Popper’s ‘Open Society and Its Enemies,’ Plato with his Master Plan for Utopia ruled by an elite oligarchy. Similarly, Brzezinski’s and Rockerfeller’s Commission, set up as a trilateral organization with members by invitation from North America, Europe and Japan. Since its inception it has co-opted an elite membership, including three U.S. Presidents, Carter, Clinton, Bush senior, powerful people like Kissinger, Greenspan, Al Gore, Soros, and later, Democrat Party members including John Podesta and Dianne Feinstein. Eric Schmidt of Google is a member. In a statement to ‘The New American,’ Patrick Wood stated the significance of the organization, ‘The Trilateral Commission was founded to create a new international order. Their members have been the architects and drivers of all modern globalization, including that which comes through the United Nations as Sustainable Development and Green Economy. Although the Trilateral Commission is international in scope, in the US they are more than just being part of the so-called Deep State, they are the Deep State!’

Powerful people with power aims. Rockefeller was a significant donor to the United Nations, its New York HQ occupies land gifted by him, not too difficult for him to foist their technocrat mission on the world via the United Nations via the Brundtland Commission. And so they have. From the Brundtland Commission to the Rio Earth Summit and Agenda 21. The U.N. itself gave credit to the Brundtland Commission for its creation.

So before I discuss some of its detail, take a look at the Agenda 21 voluminous 389 page master-plan by way of its content pages, a kind of global fly-over of a very detailed blue-print for the new international economic order, resources-based, resources-controlled and resources-rationed in the name of sustainable development and technocrat management.

And Tomorrow the World …

… Herewith the Agenda 21 contents in outline…

United Nations Conference on Environment & Development

Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992



1.Preamble. Paragraphs 1.1 – 1.6


2. International cooperation to accelerate sustainable development in developing countries and related domestic policies. Paragraphs 2.1 – 2.43
3. Combating poverty 3.1 – 3.12
4. Changing consumption patterns 4.1 – 4.27
5. Demographic dynamics and sustainability 5.1 – 5.66
6. Protecting and promoting human health conditions 6.1 – 6.46
7. Promoting sustainable human settlement development 7.1 – 7.80
8. Integrating environment and development in decision-making 8.1 – 8.54


9. Protection of the atmosphere 9.1 – 9.35
10. Integrated approach to the planning and management of land resources 10.1 – 10.18 11. Combating deforestation 11.1 – 11.40
12. Managing fragile ecosystems: combating desertification and drought 12.1 – 12.63
13. Managing fragile ecosystems: sustainable mountain development 13.1 – 13.24
14. Promoting sustainable agriculture and rural development 14.1 – 14.104
15. Conservation of biological diversity 15.1 – 15.11
16. Environmentally sound management of biotechnology 16.1 – 16.46
17. Protection of the oceans, all kinds of seas, including enclosed and semi-enclosed seas, and coastal areas and the protection, rational use and development of their living resources 17.1 – 17.136
18. Protection of the quality and supply of freshwater resources: application of integrated approaches to the development, management and use of water resources 18.1 – 18.90
19. Environmentally sound management of toxic chemicals, including prevention of illegal international traffic in toxic and dangerous products 19.1 – 19.76
20. Environmentally sound management of hazardous wastes, in hazardous wastes 20.1 – 20.46
21. Environmentally sound management of solid wastes and sewage-related issues 21.1 – 21.49
22. Safe and environmentally sound management of radioactive wastes 22.1 – 22.9


23. Preamble 23.1 – 23.4
24. Global action for women towards sustainable and equitable development 24.1 – 24.12 25. Children and youth in sustainable development 25.1 – 25.17
26. Recognizing and strengthening the role of indigenous people and their communities 26.1 – 26.9
27. Strengthening the role of non-governmental organizations: partners for sustainable development 27.1 – 27.13
28. Local authorities’ initiatives in support of Agenda 21 28.1 – 28.7
29. Strengthening the role of workers and their trade unions 29.1 – 29.14
30. Strengthening the role of business and industry 30.1 – 30.30
31. Scientific and technological community 31.1 – 31.12
32. Strengthening the role of farmers 32.1 – 32.14


33. Financial resources and mechanisms 33.1 – 33.21
34. Transfer of environmentally sound technology, cooperation and capacity-building 34.1 – 34.29
35. Science for sustainable development 35.1 – 35.25
36. Promoting education, public awareness and training 36.1 – 36.27
37. National mechanisms and international cooperation for capacity-building in developing countries 37.1 – 37.13
38. International institutional arrangements 38.1 – 38.45
39. International legal instruments and mechanisms 39.1 – 39.10
40. Information for decision making. 40.1 – 40.30

Plan for Utopia.

And now for the overview…

Following the Chapter 1 Preamble, Agenda 21 is set out in four sections.

Section 1, Social and Economic Dimensions: This section covers us humans and what we may consume…eat …use, where we may live and how we are to be allowed to develop. Significant chapters, Chapter 2, ‘International cooperation to accelerate sustainable development for all,’ Chapter 4, ‘Changing consumption patterns for sustainable development.’ Chapter 5, ‘Demographics and dynamics.’ Chapter 7. ‘Promoting habitable human settlement,’ and Chapter 8, ‘Integrating environment and development in decision making.’

Section 11, Conservation and Management of Resources Development: Well this is certainly comprehensive, fourteen chapters of precept and regulation, a new world order alright, bureaucrat control over air, land, and all living things thereon, our energy use, control of seas, rivers and other waterways, management of all waste products, ‘waste’ denoted by them to include CO2, a basis of life on earth, without it no plants and no us.

Section 111, Strengthening the Role of Major Groups: Getting everyone on board, but not as described by that UN first General Assembly in 1948, Everyone has the right to take part in the government of the country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.

Agenda 21 is not about individual involvement in decision making, it is about your role as part of a collective, you are subsumed by your role ( in which the planned Delphi process prevails, plenary discussion but the outcomes are foreordained,) you are a member of the women’s group, an indigenous group, a worker group, or your role is defined as part of a business group, a science-technology group or farmers’ group, some ironic 1984 newspeak here ‘strengthening the role of farmers,’ as more and more regulations are being imposed on land use.

Section 1V, Means of Implementation … involving financing and costs You’ll get a shock when you go there. Some hefty estimated annual costs included in Means of Implementation… Utopias don’t come cheap, quite a drain on nation’s economies. So if you’re needing to get the citizens on board for all that costly and controlling regulation you have to be persuasive, consider that H.L. Mencken adage about keeping the populace alarmed and hence clamouring for government to save them. You have to scare people and here’s how you do it … by way of SCIENCE and GUILT, Global Warming caused by us! That’s Chapter 35, ‘Science for sustainability,’ messaging by the Inter-government Panel on Climate Change set up by the UN and charged with a mission to assess human caused global warming. Any wonder they found it, though their temperature models don’t match observations and they had to disappear past warming in the historical record to achieve it.

Further Means of Implementation in Agenda 21, Chapter 36, ‘Promoting education, public awareness and training.’ Have to get school children on board, the mandatory international Education Core-Curriculum teaches sustainability from Prep to Year 12, in every subject, even math. Public awareness by public broadcasters, listen to the pervasive advertising and admonitions of thou shouldst or thou shouldst not. Leaders of large news outlets, CNN and Time Magazine include Trilateral members, Google, remember that Trilateral Commission connection, Google is censoring information. So now let’s give it some teeth.L-A-W-Law, Chapter 38, ‘International legal instruments and mechanisms,’ they’re by-passing nation’s laws here, now isn’t that contra to… The will of the people shall be the basis of authority of governments; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent voting procedures. More on legal means of implementation later.

So let’s take a look at Chapter 1, the Preamble, a mix of noble cause motherhood statement and observing H.L.Mencken’s fear and alarm comment:

‘Humanity stands at a defining moment in history. We are confronted with a perpetuation of disparities between and within nations, a worsening of poverty, hunger, ill health and illiteracy, and the continuing deterioration of the ecosystems on which we depend, for our well being. However, integration of environment and development concerns and greater attention to them will lead to the fulfillment of basic needs, improved living standards for all, better protected and managed ecosystems and a safer, more prosperous future.’

‘Trust us,’ says the United Nations Organization:

‘No Nation can achieve this on its own , but together we can – in a global partnership for sustainable development’ – ‘This global partnership must build on the premises of General Assembly 44/228 when the nations of the world called for the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development.’

Some doubtful calls in the above. Those claims of worsening standards of living? Not according to Hans Rosling showing data from World Census stats. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usdJgEwMinM That call for U.N. assistance? Can’t remember when we were asked. Decisions from afar, we the people don’t get to vote on those treaties and conventions that can have such a pervasive effect on our lives. You see the effect with that case study for technocrat management, the European Union, where fiat decision making has brought currency crises, high youth unemployment http://www.ruthfullyyours.com/2015/07/03/andrew-stuttaford-what-the-euro-has-wrought/ and social problems from unchecked immigration programs.

So now let’s take a closer look at some of the content in Agenda 21.

The Devil’s in the Detail.

In nice bureaucratic patterning the chapters in each of the four sections are set out in terms of ‘Basis for Action,’ ‘Objectives,’ ‘Activities’ and ‘Means of Implementation.’ Each chapter has segments, Part a. parts b and c, and some even go to parts j and k and l.

One of those chapters with parts a to l is Chapter 14, ‘Promoting Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development,’ the U.N SARD program that extends to 24 pages of prescripts and program areas for technocratic implementation. It certainly comes as quite a drain on national economies. Totaling the estimated average annual costs, years 1993 to 2000, for Chapter 14 alone, programs a to l, exceeded two trillion dollars.

Promoting sustainable agriculture and rural development is a very big issue in Agenda 21. Thing is, that as a basis for action, by year 2025, with an expected population of 8.5 billion, and that UN ‘SARD’ program objective, there’s quite a lot of land has to be taken out of the equation. There’s all that less productive land ear-marked for conservation, so remaining farms have to work better and that means more government direction of farmers, hence the long activities list below. In section a of Chapter 14, item 14.9, outlining its many policy prescripts, there’s an opening phrase you’ll find repeated at (14.13) (14.14) (14.15) and many times thereafter… ‘Government at the appropriate level, with the support of the relevant international and regional organizations, should’…

Herewith: 14.9:
‘Governments at the appropriate level, with the support of the relevant international and regional organizations, should:
a. Carry out national policy reviews related to food security including adequate levels and stability of food supply and access to food by all households;
b. Review national and regional agricultural policy in relation, inter alia, to foreign trade, price policy, exchange rate policies, agricultural subsidies and taxes, as well as organization for regional economic integration;
c. Implement policies to influence land tenure and property rights positively with due recognition of the minimum size of land-holding required to maintain production and check further fragmentation;
d. Consider demographic trends and population movements and identify critical areas for agricultural production;
e. Formulate, introduce and monitor policies, laws and regulations and incentives leading to sustainable agricultural and rural development and improved food security and to the development and transfer of appropriate farm technologies, including, where appropriate, low-input sustainable agricultural (LISA) systems;
f. Support national and regional early warning systems through food-security assistance schemes that monitor food supply and demand and factors affecting household access to food;
g. Review policies with respect to improving harvesting, storage, processing, distribution and marketing of products at the local, national and regional levels;
h. Formulate and implement integrated agricultural projects that include other natural resource activities, such as management of rangelands, forests, wildlife, as appropriate;
i. Promote social and economic research and policies that encourage sustainable agriculture development, particularly in fragile ecosystems and densely populated areas;

In the above list from section a … (hope you’re following the sections and sub-sections bureau-format … think Russian wooden dolls, inside each, another…) you’ll see lots of information gathering words, ‘identify’, ‘collect,’ ‘review,’ ‘monitor.’ Technocrats rely on big data collection to socially engineer us and dictate what, when, how resources are to be managed. Imbedded in most chapters in ‘activities,’ you’ll find mention of the importance of setting up national and international data bases.

In the list above, there’s also reference, at 14.9 d, to ‘identifying critical areas for agricultural production,’ ‘critical,’ by implication, meaning a fragile area to be protected from development. In chapter 14, one of the objectives of Section E, Land conservation and rehabilitation , is to create programs ‘leading to the reclamation of degraded lands and the conservation of areas at risk, and to improving the general planning, management and utilization of land resources.’ These programs, including the UN ‘Debt for Nature Swaps,’ DNS, and World Wide Fund for Nature Population Resettlement action, have had controversial outcomes. The UN program ‘Debt for Nature Swaps’ financing solutions for Sustainable Development is presented at its posted site by the statement.: ‘Debt for Nature Swaps, DNS can mobilize resources for protecting nature while reducing the debt burden of developing nations…Agreement that reduces a developing country’s debt stock or services in exchange for a commitment to protect nature from the debtor government … The savings from the reduced debt services are invested in conservation projects.’

Not a win-win exchange, however, when large tracts of land can no longer be utilized by the people and are now managed by outsiders, where hefty transaction costs paid for by the debtors and people like the Barhwa pygmies of Zaire, the Batwa pygmies of Rwanda and the Sanje bush people in Kenya have been driven from their ancestral lands to make way for national conservation parks, all managed in part by WWF people.

Give me land lots of land under starry skies above, tra la..

There’s also a land acquisition program taking place in developed nations as per Chapter 15 .3 of Agenda 21 proposing ‘urgent and decisive action’ to be taken ‘to conserve and maintain genes, species and ecosystems with a view to the sustainable management and use of biological resources.’ The UN-designed Wildlands Project, a master plan of Agenda 21, is part of the design to transform land from public ownership to large tracts of no-go wilderness managed by technocrats, each eco-area protected by buffer zones and with designated corridors linking human habitation areas. In the United States, in 1993, the Clinton Administration adopted the Agenda 21 Wildlands Project Plan and here it is, easily available on the internet.


Agenda 21, Chapter 7, Promoting human settlement development , is the program design whereby almost everybody is to be herded into cities for sustainable development. A framework for strengthening management recommended at 7.16. is the ‘United Nations Development Programme /World Bank/United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) Urban Management Programme (UMP), Its coverage should be extended to all interested countries during the period 1993- 2000.’

An allied program to the UN Habitat Sustainable Cities Programme is ICLEI the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives. Section 7.21. Agenda 21, specifically recommends involvement with ICLEI, not surprising since ICLEI was responsible for preparing the Local Council section of Agenda 21.

A lot of local councils have already adopted Agenda 21 initiatives under names like ‘A Greener City.’ What these programs envisage is a way of life in cities across four domains of ecology, economics, politics and culture, the sustainable city that will feed itself with a sustainable reliance on surrounding countryside, power itself with renewable energy and produce the smallest conceivable ecological footprint and climate change impact. In my home town in OZ, the Melbourne City Council is already on board with new building codes for sustainable development. More high-rise development along public transport systems, punitive rates charges on single dwellings, bike zones on main roads and controls on energy use, twin planks of technocrat control, land use and energy , item 7.3, in their Greening City Policy.

7.3.1 Introduce five-star energy ratings for all new residential buildings into the Victorian Building Regulations, and promote and encourage the inclusion of new energy efficiency standards for commercial development in the Building Code of Australia
7.3.2 Implement planning policies on renewable energy, starting with guidelines for wind farms, in order to integrate the Government’s policy of support for renewable energy resources across the State with the planning system
7.3.3 Support the development of a series of energy-efficient, greenhouse friendly demonstration projects, for example, Epping North as a sustainable suburb
7.3.4 Ensure that all Major Projects Victoria developments incorporate high levels of energy efficiency
7.3.5 Update the Victoria Planning Provisions and related guidelines to reflect and support the goals and directions of the Victorian Greenhouse Strategy
7.3.6 Introduce changes to Victoria’s planning and building systems that will be needed to help adapt to the impacts of climate change – following the completion of a three-year CSIRO research program funded by the Government

L-A-W – LAW.

Bears repeating, United Nations 1948: Everyone has the right to take part in the government of the country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.

There’s a Quadrant Magazine article * by Professor of Law at Queensland University, Australia., James Allan, ‘The Problem of Creeping International Legal Rule,’ September 2016, that explores the ways in which two kinds of International Law exert undemocratic influence on domestic law.(* Should be available online but Google tells me ‘No,’)

The first is by way of ambiguously phrased UN International Treaties that play an increasingly large and influential role in determining judicial outcomes compared to less ambiguous, domestic regulations, international treaties which have been formulated without any citizen input. The second type of international law, known as customary law, is a non-treaty sort of international law that can flow on from treaties and have influence on local judicial decision making although it has never been agreed to by any accountable legislators. Who gets to make these decisions are publicists, legal academics who have no democratic warrant whatsoever, and as James Allan points out, as a group ‘may well have political and moral views that diverge from those of the general public.’ And James Allan notes, regarding the election of this group of people into the International Court of Justice, many of them from non-democracies, a great deal of horse trading takes place, a method of selecting International Court judges that Allan describes as ‘opaque,’ The article is a detailed description of ways, via International Law, that a nation’s voters are overwhelmingly locked out when it comes to resolving debatable social policies.

Well that’s it cits, Agenda 21 globalist Utopia? What do we do, it’s over to you and me and us. Gotta’ get political parties representing us at the national level. Say, doesn’t everyone have the right to take part in the government of the country, directly or through freely chosen representatives ?


  1. “Everyone has the right to take part in the government of the country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.”

    Indeed, when there is no country anyone can participate in its business. (Of course, for billing purposes there is a country, since one can’t send an invoice to the globe, the planet or the world. That would be taking globalism a step too far.)

    Meanwhile, in far-away Lobbyland, the funds and resources are sensibly handled and allocated by those who know best. By their fake tans, hair plugs and revolving door sinecures shall ye know them.

    So pleased that our serf has bitten down hard on some elite ankles here. We should circulate this.

  2. I’m looking forward to reading this properly later beththeserf. There are some worrying developments around this area for sure. I can relate to the meetings where we supposedly have our say but it’s all hoodwinking stuff. Everything is pre-determined.

  3. I need to spend more time with this too . . . . and it’s my first visit here . . . . . but won’t be the last! . . . . thanks mosomoso for posting the link on Jo’s site.

  4. i see you left out the club of rome

    How do they do it?
    all activist organizations. their sole function is to manipulate.
    all charitable organizations. their sole function is to breed dependency.
    all msm. their sole function is to deliver sermons to the congregation of true believers.
    it’s global and works at the local level everywhere.
    but if there is a HQ, that would be the UN.

    Click to access Agenda21.pdf

    one of the questions going around at the moment is ‘who funds the caravan’
    this refers to the thousands of people who’ve been persuaded to journey from central america to the usa.
    the standard reply is ‘soros’, but he’s only the poster boy cuz he’s got an ugly mug.
    but like the vatican which never parts with its wealth except to provide ‘seed money’ to start a mission,
    the globalists have brought about and ‘activist industry’ which is funded primarily by tax payer money directed by sympathetic legislators and donations of true believers.
    there may be a head leech, but now there is a vast population of the who produce nothing and are utterly dependent upon ‘redistributing’ the wealth of those who do create it.
    a leech does not need to be told how to feed. it’s what he does.

    here’s some of what i have found out about the caravan

    The earliest spokespeople for the caravan were a journalist and former leftist legislator named Bartolo Fuentes and his wife, human rights activist Dunia Montoya.

    (social media was used to disseminate false promises)

    According to the Honduran government, the caravan currently making its way through Mexico can be traced back to a Facebook post by Bartolo Fuentes, an activist and former Honduran lawmaker. On October 5, Fuentes posted a graphic listing a date, time, and place to meet.

    Selee described how traveling in large numbers is a particularly attractive alternative to paying for a coyote, a term used to describe human smugglers. “For people for whom cost matters, that’s a huge incentive,” he said. The journey from Honduras to the United States, with the help of a coyote, can cost at least $4,000 and up to $12,000 a person, Martinez said.

    Bartolo Fuentes, an activist and former Honduran lawmaker, initially organized it. In an Oct. 4 Facebook post, he shared a graphic promoting a “Caminata del Migrante” (“Migrant March”). The graphic told migrants and protesters to gather on Oct. 12 at a bus station in San Pedro Sula

    they are told that:
    The U.S., however, cannot refuse migrants who are seeking asylum at the border, according to both the country’s own laws and international law.
    mainstream media in all countries shows lots of fotos of babies

    jehovah’s witnesses wait for arrival of caravan to proselytize them


    According to activist Jorge Andrade, migrants used take about 10 days to reach the US

    The local mayor, José Luis Laparra Calderón, said the municipality chipped in with food and drink, and also provided tarpaulin shelters.

    Red Cross paramedics are treating the marchers for blisters, dehydration and other maladies aggravated by physical exertion in hot and humid conditions.


    Mapastepec. The clean plaza is encircled by tents stocked with medical supplies and populated by medical staff and psychologists. Three Red Cross trucks park nearby to tend to blisters, foot fungus, dehydration and infections;

    Pueblo Sin Fronteras, a U.S.-Mexico collective that organized a 1,500-person caravan last year, has taken on a coordinating role.

    They know their next two stops — Pijijiapan and Tonala — where officials and churches have pledged to set up medical stations and provide food and shelter.

    It is the local governments that seem to take on the biggest organizing roles when the migrants make their way into town. Upon their arrival throughout the early afternoon, women and children are directed to bed down in churches and schools, where mothers fan their kids

    Emmanuel Noriega Molina, who runs Mapastepec’s finances, says the municipality and the state of Chiapas are paying for the supplies, with the Red Cross and various churches pitching in. The churches also run the area’s shelters, and during the afternoon they’re told to prepare for the next wave of arrivals

    The Catholic Church, which runs the shelter for women and children, had prepared 1,320 gallons of water for the caravan

    Town residents also offer help.


    Pueblo Sin Fronteras released a statement asking that the U.S. “respect the international right to migrate and to seek asylum and refuge.”

    Journalists are traveling with the caravan,
    (they strive show fotos of babies and mothers and any kind of distress that supports the narrative of victimhood in order to manipulate sentiments.)

    the clip shows a few Mexican drivers “taking pity” on some in the caravan and picking them up in their trucks, as the reporter on the ground describes.

    (reporters with the caravan drive the public perception)
    “So many people are joining the march because they are so desperate,” said Danira Reyes, 38, a chef from the city of La Ceiba, who hoped to reach Houston, Texas. “I just want to be able to provide for my children, and I can’t do that at home.” Reyes described how she ate food handed out by families and charities along the way.

    The first was organized in 2011, explained Ruben Figueroa, an activist from the Meso-American Migrant Movement supporting the caravan.
    meanwhile, the target host is softened up by activist groups and social media

    bible quotations are used to manage attitudes.

    most recently, a lawsuit has been filed
    as if a honduran had a clue about constitutional law suits, right?
    so who’s behind that?
    because they care about the poor immigrants- they say so right there! they are career activists (que sorpresa!)
    that’s how you get a 501c or 503c and unassailable virtue cuz they champion victims!
    victimhood is the gold standard by which all moral decisions must be evaluated.
    what they don’t say:

    while a column of hopeful poorly educated hondurans are herded on a Trail of Tears, 1500 miles, to be lined up against a wall, they humanitarians are secretly lusting for the dead baby pr0n they can rage against till it makes their stigmata bleed.


    The Rev. Jim Jones (left) was an integral part of the Democratic Party political machinery in the San Francisco Bay Area. Through him and other ministers, especially in the African American communities, the party was able to construct an impregnable culture in the region based upon Marxist ideology. Political figures include the late San Francisco Mayor George Moscone, Congresswoman Nancy Peolsi, former SF Mayor Willie Brown and U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein.

    voter fraud by bussing a congregation from out of town to stuff ballot boxes has been a major strategy.
    that’s just some that are current in the state of texas.
    they infiltrate the polling places, run voter registration drives, visit retirement homes… it’s systematic = a stratagem.

    so if you ever wondered why anyone would care what REVEREND al sharpton & jesse jackson say- they can load a bus with their sheep.
    kanye threatened to disturb the congregation – for that reason special dispensation was granted for white men on public TV to call him a ‘dumb negro’
    leave the plantation and you are hunted down and lynched.

    the progressive movement is a cult. they preach. debating an issue is just not on. the congregation must be scared to leave the flock. that is all.
    so they run a never ending inquisition and a continuous auto da fe.
    heretics must be hunted down and burned.
    nothing binds the faithful to the faith better than burning a heretic- except for beheading an apostate.
    the church owns everything and tends to the flock, distributing to those reduced to perpetual dependency.

    trump is businessman. business is premised on ownership, creation of wealth, independence.
    he’s their great satan.

    project veritas just caught out a number of democrat campaigners doing their dirty tricks. it’s normal for them.
    to expect differently is to reprise Dan Pearl’s delusion.


    • Thanks. I live in Texas and the dirty tricks are real. The local corrupt media is absolute in their commitment to bury the criminal efforts to trash our laws and sovereignty.
      That I have to get this vital news from Australia and am not hearing anything here is at once appreciated (for your efforts) and infuriated at the depth of corruption at play here.
      Please keep up the good work.

      • Well Hunter,
        I’d say the star spangled banner is still flying, you have Trump,
        and a few vigorous supporters of liberty. You’ve got EM Smith
        and Robin Eubanks and Veritas… We in OZ have 2 main political
        parties that offer little choice, our once classical Liberal Party
        supports the Paris Treaty and renewable energy and big budgets.

  5. Gnomish, thx for coming by,.

    So much here, for starters, the Club of Rome globul warming scare
    (a) as the noble cause agenda,
    (b) as the means of weakening the economies’ of western nations,’
    fossil fuel the dynamo of industrial productivity.

    The caravan, an orchestrated attack on defense of the realm by the
    enemies within.The first duty of any constitutional government is to
    protect its borders. Chaos for the nation state when it is too challenged
    by influxes of illegal immigrants, some may be terrorists, drug runners
    and large numbers of welfare dependent and non-socially-cohesive
    groups. That is the intention of yr globalists isn’t it gnomish, attacking
    the nation state and then the technocrats will step in to save us, ie.
    manage and control us?

  6. …maybe call it neo-feudalism, yes gnomish, it’s feudal, all the way
    back to William the Conqueror and the Forest Treaty, more than
    one third of England restricted as the king’s preserve.

    Yr link, Columbia University, birthplace in the 1930’s of Rockerfeller/
    Brzezinski’s new world economic order. Hey, small world 🙂

  7. OMG gnomish, I’m jest a serf, how would I know?

    I know we hafta’ win back free speech and free education from
    their K-12 ‘values’ indoctrination stranglehold … Say, what do
    you suggest? )

  8. What you are both doing is so in earnest, makes me think of Descartes,
    don’t know much about his philosophy but that he employed reason
    to search out truth. I could never be up to what you and science or fiction
    are doing but what you are doing, seems to me, goes beyond Popper’s
    provisional knowledge, to finding grounds for a clear and distinct
    understanding that something can be held to be true.

  9. Popper was a neoplatonist mystic. he violated the third law of logic.
    Dag is doing this – for himself. He can’t do it for anyone else.
    it is very challenging for somebody who has been educated.
    but any normal 4 yr old child can do acquire the habit of reasoning
    a habit is extremely hard to break.
    maybe you already know and only need the words.

  10. Journeys. suppose I’m on one as well, wandering serf. Think I muse,
    my bird poems for example, I don’t know what I’m about when I begin
    one, rather than THINK logically, wherereas you, gnomish …

    (guess i’m trying to make a thing in itself with no extraneous

  11. i admire your curiosity and you deserve the success you have to satisfy it.
    understanding is hardwired to the pleasure center. joy is the natural state.
    consciousness is identification. your mind is alive.

  12. Oh what a pithy comment, ‘understanding is hardwired to the
    pleasure centre…’ joy of the ahah moment. ..James Hutton must
    have felt it in the rowboat coming across those vertical sandstone
    pillars, Darwin on the beach in Bahia, finding the fossils of extinct
    animals and James Watt walking up a hill past the steamy wash-
    house and putting his theory together… Guess stone age hunters
    felt it, following footprints and then sighting their prey! Curiosity,
    necessary to survival. No wonder joy!

  13. The other day I decided to watch a movie I’d recorded, some sort of thriller which had kind reviews.

    As the show went on, I was reminded why I seldom use the television. The absurd and dreary “thriller” was about an accountant with autism which gave him special abilities. In the ad breaks there was a repeated promotion of a popular series…about a doctor with autism which gave him special abilities.

    Autism and super-heroes, eh? Hmmmm. Better get me some of that autism.

    Got your doubts about one of our modern gods? Thinking naughty thoughts about the way money is created and issued? It just so happens there’s a smash show about Alexander Hamilton, an all-black musical people are killing to get tickets to see. It’s the ultimate test of your empathy and cool-quotient. You wouldn’t want to fail the test, would you? (Okay, so even one minute of “Hamilton” is torture to the senses and an insult to the intelligence…but the NWO can’t be expected to hold your hand in these matters. Just go with the rave reviews and you’ll have a better life.)

    We seem to be living in a heavily and deliberately programmed culture where every step has to involve a long softening-up for acceptance so we think things are merely evolving. We might even think the ideas are our own.

    Of course, things are not evolving and the ideas are not our own.

  14. Now look moso, don’t go watching those shows, yer know yer won’t
    like them, Monday there’s Foyle and Sam, later maybe watch an
    episode of John Adams. Take anuther look at a serf’s literary posts,
    I keep telling u about Patrick O’Brian, ‘M & C,’ you’ve got an inherited
    disposition to it… and there’s that film, ‘Dean Spanley,’ don’t be put
    off by the title. I have watched it at least six times it’s like good music,
    bears repeat performances, like Foyle. )

    • Dean Spanley? Isn’t that a movie where New Zealanders philosophically discuss their feelings…about dogs?

      Of course, I’ll be watching Foyle. I make him compulsory for all my serfs.

  15. Foyle, good, saves me reminding you. ) Dean Spanley, about dogs,
    cricket and so much more. And such a beautiful production. read
    the short story but the film is better.I shall watch it again soon.

  16. To quote John Gorton, I’m no culture vulture. But I do allow my serfs to alert me now and then to the odd bit of culture. Without serfs, no Foyle for me.

    But returning to the subject, there have been many Agenda(s) before the one called 21. This one links the names of Roosevelt, Carnegie and Lenin in interesting ways: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2hN7CHGGqU

    If I had the money fitting to my rank of arch-toff I’d spend my time even more idly than I do now. Sadly, many plutocrats want to reshape the world, which is why they always end up in cahoots with their theoretical opposites. The bolsheviks had few better buddies than Western plutocrats and their slavish academia/ media complex. And what’s changed?

    Re my idea we have to be softened-up over a calculated period by that academia/media complex before accepting some new globalist absurdity: I reckon even ten years ago this would have been a step too far: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_UeESh60_A

    When you think of it, same-sex marriage was barely a thing ten years ago, now you risk prosecution in some places if you express doubts on the subject. Asgardia would have been a cheesy prank not long ago. Now it is a massively funded and supported global project (though it is still phenomenally cheesy). Makes you think. What will most be accepting ten years from now?

  17. we hear a lot about science getting politicised

    but sometimes politics gets scientised

    compare two tenets dear to SJWs—an old one:

    1. with economic growth, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer

    and one they adopted recently:

    2. as you put energy into a system, both extremes (warm and cold) increase

    Both in violation of thermodynamics, of course.

    but hey, who needs science if The Science is on your side?

  18. The human brain contains many surprises; a place built for fast thinking, not reasoning. Most decisions are made based on brain networks already in place and developed by a person’s social experiences. Brain mechanisms often deceive the self into believing a decision is logical when it is not, hence the lack of understanding among us and the tendency of like minded individuals to gather. This problem is inherent to humans and can only be mitigated with a disciplined structure that forces slow and honest communication.

  19. It ain’t easy to think. Think fast and bias confirmation is the tendency. But we have a frontal cortex that enables us to do it and the logic system and attention to evidence if we really wish to know as opposed to grasp a reality. As you say, Richard, the problem can only be mitigated with a disciplined structure that forces slow and honest communication.

  20. Pingback: 59th EDITION SERF UNDER_GROUND JOURNAL | beththeserf

  21. Pingback: 64th EDITION SERF UNDER_GROUND JOURNAL | beththeserf

  22. Pingback: 68th EDITION SERF UNDER_GROUND JOURNAL | beththeserf

  23. Pingback: 69th EDITION SERF UNDER_GROUND JOURNAL | beththeserf

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s